First it was politics, now it’s about ethics. By the seemingly operative anti-hermeneutic at work, I think this means that onticology supports killing babies if that means saving more lollipops.
Responses
Leave a Reply
Categories
- Africana philosophy
- Agamben
- Animal Ethics
- Articles of Interest
- Badiou
- Conferences
- Critical Race Theory
- Current Events
- Democratic Theory
- Derrida
- Economics
- Environmental philosophy
- Feminism
- Foucault
- General Thoughts
- Graham Harman
- Harding
- Heidegger
- Larval Subjects
- Meillassoux
- Merleau-Ponty
- Nancy
- Negri
- Nietzsche
- Off topic
- Polemics
- Rancière
- Rules for Engagement
- Sovereignty
- Speculative Realism
- Stiegler
- Syllabi
- teaching
- Uncategorized
- Unsolicited Advice
- Vattimo
- Žižek
[...] under Uncategorized Leave a Comment Over at Philosophy in a Time of Error, Gratton admirably sums up onticology’s and OOO’s positions on politics and ethics: First it was politics, now [...]
By: This Gave Me a Good Laugh « Larval Subjects . on June 30, 2010
at 7:56 pm
Lollipops are clearly the feed of the neoconservative hegemony. Follow the sugar.
By: Ian Bogost on June 30, 2010
at 8:10 pm
LOL!!! Now that is funny…
By: michael- on June 30, 2010
at 8:25 pm